|
The
Nuts and Bolts of Working With a Fastener Consultant
HOW, WHEN AND WHERE TO USE ONE
We recently
spoke with seven fastener industry consultants about issues concerning
hiring and working with a consultant. If you're a regular reader of American
Fastener Journal or Fastening magazine, you'll certainly recognize the
members of our panel as regular contributors to each. Combined, these
men have centuries of experience in nearly every aspect of the industry.
And as consultants, they've had the opportunity to extend their learning
even further by working with many of you in the resolution of countless
fastener industry related problems. Our panel included: Rich Barrett,
Lon DeHaitre, Tom Doppke, Joe Greenslade, Bill Pierce, Dr. Lou Raymond,
and Jim Speck. We tried to ask the questions that you might ask, and we
think the answers we received shed some light on the consulting process
and how to best work with experts once you've decided to bring them in.
We trust you'll find their insights helpful.
When
is the right time to call in a consultant?
The answer to this question was pretty much a consensus.
All of our consultants agreed that the best time to bring in an expert
is early on in the process‹long before the problem is out of control.
BARRETT:
"Oftentimes, people don't call a consultant in until things have become
chaotic. Then they may say, "OK, we've already got the parts made, we
don't want to scrap the parts, so you figure out a way to make this
work." A much better environment for everyone involved is to place a
consultant in an advisory role early on in the process before the damage
has been done. Consultants are often better utilized as advisors, rather
that fix-it men after the fact."
SPECK:
"By bringing somebody in early, you can go to school on that
person's experiences. And, that's what any consultant does is bring
in a range of experiences and allow whoever is bringing them in to gain
access to that range of experiences. It's an information business."
DOPPKE:
"My advice is to call in a consultant as soon as the problem has been
defined. That is, when it is determined that the problem is loosening
or failure of the attachment. This saves the time and money otherwise
spent in shotgunning the problem and prolonging the solution."
RAYMOND:
"It's very common to not call in a consultant until something breaks.
But that's why I suggest having someone in at the conceptual stage,
in the design, materials, or manufacturing areas to prevent problems.
The big question isŠhow do you know you'll need someone? For some companies,
keeping a consultant on retainer‹someone you can call on whenever you
need him‹is the best strategy."
GREENSLADE:
"I've always found that one of the keys to problem solving is attacking
the problem early. So many of the problems that I have encountered could
have been solved early on in the process-long before losing a customer."
What
should somebody look for in a consultant?
DOPPKE:
"Obviously, using an aerospace expert in ground vehicle
for general industrial problems is not conductive to a rapid solution.
Conversely using an automotive expert usually won't help with a bridge
problem."
BARRETT:
"Job experience in the specific field is crucial, so that the consultant
requires little time to get up to speed on the problem."
PIERCE:
"Take a look at whom the consultant has worked for in the past, what
problems he has encountered and solved. Also, a good way to get a feel
for someone is to look at the articles he has published."
SPECK:
"Good, relevant, technical credentials are important, but it depends
on the nature of the problem. If you're trying to get an assembly line
running, you may want to bring in somebody with a lot of practical line
experience, as opposed to someone with an extensive academic background.
However, if you're doing a brand new computerized design, you may want
somebody with very strong academic experience because you're going to
need someone who is up to date on the latest theories. Credentials are
important insomuch as how they match up with the problem being addressed.
But I don't think there is any one single package to look for-it depends
on the problem."
What
should you make available to the consultant when you call him in?
BARRETT:
"Have all the facts together, as far as the materials, the properties,
the operating conditions and anything else that may be remotely relevant.
This, of course, will save time and consequently money because you won't
be paying the consultant to gather background information that could
have already been prepared."
DOPPKE:
"Failed and unfailed parts from the same lot, sketches, and drawings
of the joint details of assembly and construction of the entire applications,
forces and calculations of loads if possible. Everything. The more information
you get, the faster and easier it is to offer a solution. And of course,
faster means cheaper."
SPECK:
"Have a clear definition of success. Define the problem, and define
what you think will be a satisfactory conclusion. This avoids venturing
out on what I call Œfishing expeditions"‹taking off on several different
paths, meandering to a close, and not really reaching any significant
success. Also, be completely open with the consultant. Give them full
access to all the information they'll need to assist you in solving
the problem. Having surprises come up halfway through the project is
to no one's advantage."
GREENSLADE:
"I usually insist on an itinerary and a one-sentence objective describing
exactly why I'm going into a customer. That way there is no confusion
on either end and we can get right to it."
PIERCE:
"Have a very good idea of what you want the consultant to do‹will he
have to go back and redesign, or will he be working with what's there.
Also, it's important to have a clearly defined timeline‹what will be
done and when?"
In what
specific areas can consultants be of help?
DOPPKE:
"Almost all areas of automotive are "hot" now. With tiering of sources,
more and more sub-suppliers are being given the responsibility of the
attachments, and many do not have trained fastener people. General industry
has a growing problem as well, as federal and local regulations require
some sort of responsibility for design and safety of fastened items.
Lawsuits and such are requiring that experts be available to defend
and justify what was built and its conformance to known loading and
the like."
GREENSLADE:
"One area where distributors can use consultants to their advantage
is in applications engineering and customer/company reviews of products
needs. Companies are discovering how difficult it can be to find good
applications engineers. By assisting an OEM in solving fastening problems,
a consultant with a diverse technical background can help expand a company's
market reach. Selling proprietary items that solve particular types
of problems makes companies much more valuable than others that just
take orders. Another way that I've been able to assist distributors
is as a third party in the review of problems. Most commonly, there
is a fastener that is failing, and often, it is caused by misuse. In
a case like that, the end user doesn't really want to hear from the
manufacturer or distributor questions such as: Are you tightening them
properly? Are you using the right torque values? It can feel to the
end user that someone is just trying to avoid responsibility. So, as
an impartial third party, I am able to offer an objective opinion and
help the parties come to an agreement. I guarantee that fastener manufacturers
could save a great deal of money, as well as customer relationships,
by calling in a third party earlier to help resolve these issues."
RAYMOND:
"When moving or expanding into a new area, it's important to get an
experienced viewpoint from an expert in that field‹from someone who's
been there."
DOPPKE:
"Ongoing training is crucial when dealing with customers in as broad
a market as fasteners. Everyone should be investing on a regular basis.
Many of the very large organizations can afford to have full-time trainers
on staff. Smaller companies need consultants."
Why
are some companies reluctant to use consultants?
RAYMOND:
"Consultants now provide information that companies considered to be
able to get free from suppliers and manufacturers."
DOPPKE:
"I think a big part of it is because everybody is afraid of the blank
check. When a problem hasn't been clearly defined, there is the possibility
that a project can drag on and on. And that certainly can get very expensive.
But the upside to consultants is that companies don't have a full-time
cost burden. They're just buying the time. If they don't like what they
get, they can stop it at anytime."
Who
needs a consultant?
SPECK:
"Obviously, if you have a very small problem, you don't
want to bring in a whole team of consultants. You may be able to make
due with just a little bit of legwork on your own. For instance, American
Fastener Journal and Fastening Magazine offer quite a bit of useful
information. On the other end of the spectrum, if the cost of failure
is very high, say for example, a new product launch, high volume with
a high front-end investment, you won't want to wait till there's a problem.
It's just good insurance to bring in one or maybe a couple of experts."
DEHAITRE:
"Who needs a consultant: At some time or another, everyone supplying
or using fasteners. The OEM benefits from the consultant's knowledge‹the
most efficient choice can be made quickly. The fastener industry is
also very competitive and they too have been forced to run lean and
mean. Everyone's personnel are required to wear many hats and unfortunately,
it's hard to do everything well.
Manufacturers
have in-house technical talent but these individuals may not be sales
types with people skills. Distributors will have personnel with marketing
talent but they may be lacking in design, process or application expertise.
A qualified consultant can train and execute without bureaucratic restraints‹he's
being paid to get it done correctly for his client. That's where the need
for consultants comes in."
|